DMK · booth-by-booth

DMKDMK booth-level extremes

Of the 234 seats in the Tamil Nadu 2026 Assembly, DMK contested 175 as the lead of the SPA alliance — the state arm of the INC-led UPA / INDIA bloc.

Booths analysed
46,160
Constituencies
175
Minimum valid votes in a booth
200

Booth share spectrum

46,160 contested booths

How every booth this party contested distributes by share — from wipeout (red) to fortress (green). Most booths sit in the strong band (30–50%) — 47% of contested booths.

Wipeout 0–1%
0 · 0.0%
Very weak 1–5%
9 · 0.0%
Weak 5–15%
1,041 · 2.3%
Competitive 15–30%
20,329 · 44.0%
Strong 30–50%
21,912 · 47.5%
Dominant 50–80%
2,518 · 5.5%
Fortress 80%+
351 · 0.8%

Fortressesbooths above 80% share

351

DMK crossed 80% share in 351 polling stations — more than any other party. The top fortresses concentrate in three patterns: minority Muslim areas where IUML stood aside (Kayalpattinam, Melvisharam), SC-reserved seats where the DMK candidate ran unopposed by an alliance partner (Vasudevanallur), and dense urban DMK wards in Ranipet and Tiruchendur.

Hot pocketsbooth share far above AC average

736

These are booths where DMK's vote share at the polling station was at least 35 percentage points above its average across that constituency. The biggest pockets cluster in Manapparai and Vasudevanallur, where micro-localities delivered 80-90% even though the seat itself was competitive.

Knife-edgesbooths decided by 2 votes or fewer

583

DMK won 301 polling stations by 2 votes or fewer — 50 of them by a single vote. Thiruvallur (AC 4) alone produced 23 knife-edge wins.

Wins · 301

Losses · 282

Alliance lens

DMK is part of SPA Secular Progressive Alliance

State-level reflection of the INC-led UPA / INDIA-bloc coalition. Congress is a member; DMK leads at state level. Members: DMK, INC, VCK, CPI, CPI(M), IUML, MDMK, DMDK.

Methodology & Sources

Source data: ECI Form 20 (statutory booth-level result statements) for all 234 Tamil Nadu Assembly Constituencies, 2026. Per-AC files committed at data/ac-drilldown/.

Booth-size threshold: only polling stations with at least 200 valid votes are included in any list. This excludes micro-booths (typically auxiliary stations with <100 voters) where a 100% share is statistically trivial.

Extremes-only framing: averages, by-district rollups, and median statistics are deliberately omitted. Each list is gated by a hard threshold — fortresses (≥80% share), wipeouts (<1% share), hot/cold pockets (booth share ±35 percentage points from AC average), knife-edges (margin ≤2 votes).

Alliance composition: TN 2026 alliances are hand-curated in data/ac-insights/context/alliances.json. SPA (DMK + INC + VCK + CPI + CPI(M) + IUML + MDMK + DMDK) reflects the INC-led UPA / INDIA bloc at state level. NTDA (AIADMK + PMK + BJP + AMMK) reflects the BJP-led NDA. TVK and NTK contested alone, outside both national blocs.

Demographic tags: only two are used — minority_muslim_area and minority_christian_area — applied to a small hand-curated list of widely-known localities (10 Muslim-area locality keywords; 4 ACs in the Kanyakumari Christian belt). Tags describe locality context, not voter intent. Caste demographics, population numbers, and Census citations are deliberately not used; readers can infer further context from booth names, AC names, and district names. SC-reserved seats are already labelled in the AC name itself.

Numbers from Form 20, narration from this site’s editorial layer. Every number in this page traces back to a row in the per-AC drilldown JSON.

Or put two parties side by side in the party comparison tool.